Supporting Documents For SSR Cycle 4
Extended Profile Criterion 1 Criterion 2 Criterion 3 Criterion 4 Criterion 5 Criterion 6 Criterion 7
Criterion 2 – Teaching-learning and Evaluation
Metric No.
PARTICULARS
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
2.1 Student Enrollment and Profile
2.1.1
Enrolment percentage
View Document
2.1.1.1
Number of seats filled year wise during last five years (Only first year admissions to be considered)
View Document
2.1.1.2
Number of sanctioned seats year wise during last five years
View Document
2.1.2
Percentage of seats filled against reserved categories (SC, ST, OBC etc.) as per applicable reservation policy for the first year admission during the last five years
View Document
2.1.2.1
Number of actual students admitted from the reserved categories year wise during last five years (Exclusive of supernumerary seats)
View Document
2.1.2.2
Number of seats earmarked for reserved category as per GOI/ State Govt rule year wise during the last five years
View Document
2.2 Student Teacher Ratio
2.2.1
Student – Full time Teacher Ratio (Data for the latest completed academic year)
View Document
2.3 Teaching- Learning Process
2.3.1
Student centric methods, such as experiential learning, participative learning and problem solving methodologies are used for enhancing learning experiences and teachers use ICT- enabled tools including online resources for effective teaching and learning process
View Document
2.4 Teacher Profile and Quality
2.4.1
Percentage of full-time teachers against sanctioned posts during the last five years
View Document
2.4.1.1
Number of sanctioned posts year wise during the last five years
View Document
2.4.2
Percentage of full time teachers with NET/SET/SLET/ Ph. D./D.Sc. /D.Litt./L.L.D. during the last five years (consider only highest degree for count)
View Document
2.4.2.1
Number of full time teachers with NET/SET/SLET/Ph. D./ D.Sc. /D.Litt./L.L.D year wise during the last five years
View Document
2.5 Evaluation Process and Reforms
2.5.1
Mechanism of internal/ external assessment is transparent and the grievance redressal system is time- bound and efficient
View Document
2.6 Tea cher Profile and Quality
2.6.1
Programme Outcomes (POs) and Course Outcomes (COs) for all Programmes offered by the institution are stated and displayed on website
View Document
2.6.2
Attainment of POs and COs are evaluated.
Explain with evidence in a maximum of 500 words
View Document
2.6.3
Pass percentage of Students during last five years (excluding backlog students)
View Document
2.6.3.1
Number of final year students who passed the university examination year wise during the last five years
View Document
2.6.3.2
Number of final year students who appeared for the university examination year-wise during the last five years
View Document
2.7 Student Satisfaction Survey
2.7.1
Online student satisfaction survey regarding teaching learning process
View Document